Friday 26 July 2013

Park design in London



                                                            Park design in London

Potters field park is one of the new parks destined fairly recently. Unfortunately some of the trends become very evident in this place particularly that of new urban park design. Gone now is the urge for something naturalistic against the cold, hard lines of the buildings. We live now in an era of sanitized parks full of low plantings that make everybody feel safe.

More or less the idea has been to cut out undergrowth. Very few trees dot the landscape. In a park that is designed to about the new London assembly buildings all seems to point to a reoccurrence of the old socialist planning ideas of Eastern Europe. Every part of the ark must be clearly visible so there is a clear loss of visibility. The philosophy is that if you are not doing anything bad you have nothing to fear. All plantings are of low perennials with even trees kept to a minimum

At the moment this is a common theme of newly designed parks in London. Much is made of the fact that if there is too much undergrowth people do not feel safe . All the newly designed parks such as Burgess Park exhibit some of these factors. For the new planners any undergrowth is anathema and they have this belief that everybody supports their ideas. So a thicket is something to be eradicated and we will get groups of schoolchildren to carve a path so that all you see are the are stems of trees and nothing below but the cold, hard ground.

This vision is supposed to make people feel safe but actually cuts away and mystery and perspective in the design of parks so that Potter’s field park looks decidedly like an urban dystopia rather than a reflection of nature. Nature is now something to be controlled in size and rendered totally controlled and antiseptic. Little of course is said about the effect it has on wildlife. Some species such as blackbirds relish the environment of low shrubs which afford them protection ad safety. Such things are forgotten in the endless search for sanitization.

Sunday 16 June 2013

mobile madness



                                                Mobile madness

It is about twenty years since mobile telephones first entered our lives. Mostly in communications terms they are an absolute boon making possible communication across vast distances by means of texting and also pure and simple phoning. In fact to remember the days before mobiles were invented it is easy to wonder how we ever lived without them.

Almost everybody has one these days apart from a few technophobic individuals.  The technology is ubiquitous. Now of course the question is how did we ever live without them. Smart phones have married technology with new developments such as global positioning and use of the internet.
However human development has not always kept up with their use.

It is a common sight to see people walking along the pavements and across roads so thoroughly engrossed in what is going on that they are oblivious to what is going on around them. It would be interesting to see how many accidents are cased by this. 

The other development is of course people speaking loudly on their phones in places such as buses. This is quite amusing to me as I always wonder what these people would feel if they could hear themselves speak.

The scene is clear . You are sitting on the bus and somebody gets on speaking loudly about their lives and their relationships with people.

I sit with the thought “I don't know you from Adam but I know all your business” You hear people describe such intimate details of their lives in such loud and penetrating voices that you begin to wonder if this is a display of public exhibitionism or whether these people are intentionally unaware. Of course at the end of the conversation you feel that you know them as it is impossible not to listen

People describe such intimate details of their lives on these devices it actually boggles the mind. I have heard details of their business relationships, the deals they are doing, Who they are going to sort out, who they live with and such like.

In an age where there is a lot of worry about the spying of government agencies and such like and the question of the privacy of the individual it certainly means with some of these people monitoring would be so easy. You could just imagine recording a conversation and anybody could know everything about them. Surveillance would be so easy!









Saturday 8 June 2013

Stress of city wildlife



                                                Stress in city wildlife

A new study has just shown that animals are also susceptible to the at pace of city life. Birds have been shown to rise earlier and to encounter higher levels of stress. Several times when I have travelled during the night I have encountered pigeons hanging around all the fast food places. It appears the birds are awake longer than they would be in a rural setting. Birds in the city wake on average half an hour earlier than their forest cousins.

The implications of this are profound! Do we expect that they will get the same diseases as city dwellers get?

The evidence for this is now somewhat patchy. The dawn chorus starts earlier as birds wake up from the night and proceed to defend their territories. The day starts a lot earlier and they are reputed to have greater success in finding mates. In many ways we see the birds as a mirror image of ourselves. They keep the same times and in some ways like the pigeons I saw they stay up later and rise earlier.

This begs of course a massive question as when looking at wildlife in the city somewhat reduced in number of species it runs to how they deal with the stress. What would definitely e interesting would be to know if this causes the same sort of problems as we see in humans with negative medical effects.

As they share our city world with its bright lights and fast pace does it follow that they are affected by the same sort of problems. The original survey was done on blackbirds. They are quite a common species in the towns but there were calls for studies to be made on urban foxes as well. London has its fair share of scavengers with the main urban wildlife being foxes, a fairly ubiquitous part of our wildlife, crows and magpies, starlings and of course the pigeon.

How they are affected extends to what they are eating as well.  Many of the species that successfully make their homes in the city are scavengers. They scavenge all that humans eat and in this case it means dealing with takeaways. Most London areas are filled with takeaway shops bearing things like “Chicken and chips” and kebabs. In many cases the people who eat these are either drunk or spoiled and the remains are fast thrown on the ground to be picked up by the scavengers that lurk. Many times an old carton of chicken and chips is pecked on by the starlings, crows, pigeons or foxes who suddenly materialize on any morsel that has been dropped.

These birds materialize and peck at the discarded food. Most of the time they only search for that as do the flocks of crows that appear in the neighbouring areas looking for the trash left by humans. Scavenging makes food finding easy

Rubbish bins suffer the same fate as crows and foxes try in their turn to tale what is left. The question of course is if they eat such bad food, don they suffer the consequences as humans do and end up suffering various conditions such as clogging of the arteries and various circulatory disorders or does the fact that they lead active lives protect then from this?

This is a question we will find hard to k now as there is no knowledge of how much calcification and hardening of the arteries there is. Many urban birds partake in some way in the feast ! Yet nobody can say quite how it will affect them.


Monday 13 May 2013

Soup kitchen Britain



                                                Soup Kitchen Britain

“Are you all right mate? Are you hungry?” the woman with a foreign accent asked me as I was returning late at night. “Here I have some biscuits”
“No thanks I am fine” I replied as I walked on.
This begs the question of what is happening in the UK as regards to people's nutrition. Stories abound as to soup kitchens that have been set up and various charities are going around London distributing food. This is a new development as previously the social security system had ensured that nobody starved. Today however a combination of high energy bills, changes to the social security system and inflation have ensured that for some people having enough to eat is problematic.

Initially there was a problem of the poor eating healthy food. In many ways somebody on benefits would have the problem of eating healthily. For any mothers the solution was to buy the children chicken and chips which while being the cheapest food to buy is not necessarily the healthiest. In many cases eating healthily was the preserve of the salaried middle classes.

Today there is a general assumption that food poverty has returned. This is now defined officially as people spending more than ten per cent of their income on food. In some ways this is a generalization as many people are scrimping and scraping, and in most cases not eating very healthily.

Recently I as approached in my local supermarket and given a sheet by my local food bank detailing the things they would like me to buy. I bought a can of tinned vegetables and donated it to them later
“God Bless You Sir”
The woman beamed and thanked me profusely. To some extent prior to the economic crisis this would have been considered unlikely that anybody would be going to bed hungry. However the complexity of the social security system and the various attempts to change it have brought about the situation where people can often be left without a penny. The food banks are delivering food across the country to people in food poverty

However there is also a situation where many people are forced to rely on moneylenders who charge extortionate interest rates and take the payments often directly from bank accounts. In this case many people are forced to go without food. There can be a situation where people literally do not have enough to eat

Nearby where I work is a shop that is run by a charity that feeds the hungry. I was told by the woman in charge that they fed students with a nutritious vegetarian soup kitchen. Students are not people traditionally considered to be in this state as they are considered part of the privileged classes as their degrees will earn them more money at a future date. That does not translate into the now for the moment and many struggle to make ends meet. Due to the plethora of loans they now get from the government they have hard time paying all their bills and many are left in food poverty.

Normally it is rare to spot people looking emaciated. This is not a situation such as in Africa but the malnutrition can appear in many forms. A lot is made of the postcode lottery in this country where in some postcodes the services do not exist and in many cases it is difficult to get a crisis loan.

Previously soup kitchens were considered the preserve of alcoholics who spent their money on drink and then had none lefty over. The new users however are people who plainly do not have the money to spend on food, let alone alcohol. The experience of food poverty has come to stay in the United Kingdom despite the country generally regarding itself as having a cradle to grave social welfare system. In many ways the experience is new and as many as five million Britons are now considered to live in food poverty.

The issue of food price inflation has also contributed to the hunger crisis in the country. This can be seen in the working and non working alike. In most cases inflation is running rampant and in the public sector at least and most of the private sector as well wages have been frozen. This has resulted in a vicious circle in which living standards are steadily being squeezed. Many of the people relying on food banks and soup kitchens are people in work. Many jobs are low paid leaving the worker dependent on some input of state benefits.

All of these contribute to the idea of a third world Britain where things usually associated with images of Africa are appearing again in our streets despite the best efforts of a welfare state created so many years ago to provide cradle to grave social security.

Thursday 2 May 2013

Irritations of london



                                                Irritations of London

London as a city to live in is regarded as full of many virtues. For those of us who live here there is the problem of transport.

It is truly said that In London everybody has two jobs. Your job and the second job is getting to and from your job. This is one of the biggest headaches as everybody has to face this. One level we speak of transport. London's public transport is in many ways antiquated and many parts of the city have old streets that have passed their usefulness. Public transport cannot run on the buses that have to make their way through narrow streets. The moment there are roadblocks are the traffic delays unbelievable.  If one side of the lane is blocked then traffic piles up in every direction:  cars, buses, taxis and about anything you care to mention. All sit in impotent rage in the traffic as it begins to take ages to get anywhere.

The surest way to get anywhere fast is on the metro known as the “tube”. This however is often subject to delays as well caused by such things as engineering works and signaling problems. It is also more expensive to use than the buses. Trains serve certain stations particularly for those who have to commute as property has got so expensive in London that many people are forced to live outside the city. Trains are packed and usually there are not enough to meet the demand for places so most people are used to standing on their way to work. This also happens on the tube in the morning rush hour where there is often standing room only and at certain stations it is impossible to board the trains as people are already packed like sardines.

Well some might say the solution is to use a car. Well that has its problems as well as in Central London at least there is a great problem of finding anywhere to park it. Parking is at a premium and many people end up facing the parking wardens paid to enforce parking rules. This is one of the most horrible jobs in the city and means taking an awful lot of abuse from the people who have been ticketed. The other problem is that to drive in central London it is necessary to pay a congestion charge. This was set up several years ago to ease traffic congestion. Something has to be done would be the view of many people here and prior to that gridlock was unbelievable.

Of course the other alternative is to cycle to wok. However that is potentially suicidal! Accidents are frequent and busy intersections abound with flowers placed there by friends and family of cyclists killed in accidents where lorry drivers do not see them. There is little provision for cycling lanes so many times cyclist ride on pavements thereby endangering pedestrians.

The other way of course, of walking is not an option for most people as they live great distances from their place of work. One of the problems that causes this is the property bubble in London. As the city authorities have promoted the city as a place to live, more and more people have been forced out of the city centres being unable to afford the property prices. In many cases buyers from abroad have made it impossible for ordinary people to live in the city. So for many Londoners it is a difficult struggle to get to and from work each day, many people having to spend one, two, three hours travelling each way.

This of course impacts on family life and work-life balance to a large degree meaning that levels of stress in the city are quite high.